Study Designs Commonly
Used in Epidemiologic Air Pollution Studies
Case–control study
In a case–control study, persons in a population who develop particular diseases,
or who die from those diseases, are identified and then classified according
to their exposure to air pollution and other factors related to disease occurrence,
such as age and cigarette-smoking status. These are the cases. A sample of members
of the study population who were free of the disease at the time that the case
subjects became ill or died (the controls) is also selected and classified in
terms of the same risk factors. An estimate of the relative risk of disease or
death that is associated with a particular factor, often termed an odds ratio,
can then be calculated. The case–control approach provides an efficient alternative
to a cohort study (see description below), because the relative risk of disease
or death can be estimated in a population without having to collect information
on all its members.
Case–crossover study
In a case–crossover study, cases of, or deaths from, particular diseases that
occur in a population are studied to provide an estimate of the effect of short-term
exposure to air pollution. For each person who has the disease or who has died,
exposure to air pollution is determined for a period near the time of diagnosis
or death (the case period) and one or more periods during which the health event
did not occur (control periods). The relative risk can then be estimated using
standard methods of analysis for matched case–control data.
Cohort study
Cohort studies provide estimates of the
effects of prolonged exposure to air pollution on mortality and morbidity
due to chronic disease. In a cohort study, members of an entire population
who are initially free of disease are observed over an extended period
of time. Each member of the population is classified according to his
or her exposure to air pollution, often determined on the basis of
place of residence, and according to other factors related to the occurrence
of disease, such as age and cigarette-smoking status. The rates of
disease or death that occur among the exposed and unexposed persons
are then compared in order to estimate the effects of exposure, with
comparisons often presented as a ratio of rates,
or relative risk.
Cross-sectional
study
Cross-sectional studies are typically used
to study the effects of long-term exposure to air pollution on the
prevalence of chronic respiratory symptoms and disease or on chronic
impairment of pulmonary function. In a cross-sectional study, the disease
status and exposure to air pollution of population members at a fixed
point in time are determined. The effect of exposure on the prevalence
of disease can then be calculated. In contrast to case–control or cohort studies
(see above), however, in a cross-sectional study it is often not possible to
determine the temporal relationship between exposure and disease.
Ecologic study
In an ecologic study, also called an aggregate-level
study, information is not collected on individual members of a population;
instead, the relationship between average rates of disease or death
and average exposure to air pollution in the population is analyzed.
Such studies often make use of routinely collected data on both health
outcomes and levels of air pollution. When ecologic studies compare
incidence or mortality rates for whole populations in geographic regions
with different average levels of air pollution, they can provide estimates
of the relative risk of disease or death due to air pollution exposure.
These estimates are often more difficult to interpret than those
from case–control or cohort
studies because they are not based on data on individual subjects.
Health-impact
study
Health-impact studies, or assessments, are
often used to estimate the potential benefits in terms of public health
of actions taken to improve air quality. In a health-impact study,
the amount of disease, disability, or death attributable to exposure
to air pollution in a specific locale is quantified. Such analyses
make use of data on the levels of air pollution and the rates of disease
or death in that locale and estimates of the effect of air pollution
on the incidence of disease or on mortality, such as relative risks
from epidemiologic studies. The effect estimates might come from
studies of the local population, but when such studies are not available,
estimates from studies in other populations might also be used.
Panel study
Panel studies are often used to estimate
the effects of short-term exposure to air pollution on acute respiratory
symptoms or changes in pulmonary function or other biomarkers. In a
panel study, a small group, or “panel,” of individuals
is followed for a short period of time. During that period, health outcomes and
exposure to air pollution are ascertained for each subject on several occasions,
and the longitudinal relationship between exposure and outcome is analyzed.
Time-series study
A time-series study provides
an estimate of the effects of short-term exposure to air pollution.
Typically, daily counts of health events, such as deaths or hospital
admissions, in one or more locales are analyzed in relation to contemporaneous
data on daily concentrations of air pollutants and other risk factors,
such as weather, that vary over time. Statistical techniques, typically
Poisson regression, are then applied to these data to estimate the
proportional increase in the rate of disease or death that is associated
with a given increment in exposure to air pollution.
Read more about pollutants and
abbreviations commonly used
in air pollution research.
|